Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About us
    • Board of Commissioners
    • Directors
    • Contact us
    • Data protection
    • Making a complaint
    • Our teams
      • Enforcement
      • Policy and Risk
      • Registry
      • Supervision
      • Intelligence
    • Strategic Roadmap
  • Careers
  • Industry
    • Codes of Practice
      • Alternative Investment Funds Code of Practice
      • Certified Funds Code of Practice
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 1
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 2
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 3
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 4
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 5
      • Fund Services Business Code of Practice
      • General Insurance Mediation Business Code of Practice
      • Insurance Business Code of Practice
      • Investment Business Code of Practice
      • Money Service Business Code of Practice
      • Trust Company Business Code of Practice
    • Consultations
      • Fee consultation No 3 2024 - Feedback Paper
      • 2024 consultations
      • 2023 consultations
      • 2022 consultations
      • 2021 consultations
      • 2020 consultations
      • 2019 consultations
      • 2018 consultations
      • 2017 consultations
      • 2016 consultations
      • 2025 consultations
    • Examinations
    • Fees
    • Financial crime
    • Innovation Hub
      • About
      • Help
      • Collaboration
      • Regtech
      • Fintech
      • Suptech
      • Virtual Asset Service Providers
      • Local partnerships and associations
      • Innovation reports
    • Forms
    • Guidance and policy
    • International-co-operation
      • International assessments
      • Memoranda of Understanding
      • Sanctions
    • Legislation
    • Regulated entities
    • Risk
      • National Risk Assessments
    • Sectors
      • Auditors
      • Banking
      • Funds
        • Fund statistics FAQs
      • General Insurance Mediation Business
      • Insurance
      • Investment Business
      • Financial Crime - Schedule 2 Business
      • Trust Company Business
      • Non- profit organisations
        • Non-profit organisations legislation
        • NPO risk assessment
        • Non-profit-organisations-risk-assessment
      • Financial Institutions
      • Money Service Business
    • Schedule 2 Business FAQs
    • Sustainable finance
  • News and events
    • Events and webinars
    • Industry updates
    • News
    • Public statements and warnings
    • RSS feeds
    • Subscribe
  • Protecting the public
    • Fraud prevention
    • Investment mis-selling
    • World Investor Week
    • Retail business accepting large sums of cash
  • Publications
    • Annual reports
    • Business plans
    • Presentations
    • Service reports
    • Engagement reports
    • 2026-2030 strategy
  • Registry
    • Annual confirmation
    • Beneficial ownership information
    • Register or make a change
    • Registry fees
    • Registry forms
    • Registry legislation
    • Registry notices
      • Public notices
    • 2025 Registry fees
    • 2024 Registry fees
  • Whistleblowing
  • Login
Jersey Financial Services Commission Jersey Financial Services Commission
  • About us
  • Industry
  • Registry
  • Protecting the public
  • News and events
  • Login

Popular searches

  • Industry Survey
  • Annual confirmation statement
  • Business Plan
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Guidance notes
  • myProfile
  • myRegistry
  • Outsourcing
  • Sanctions
  • Sound business policy
  • Consumer credit

You are here

  • Home
  • News and events
  • Trustcorp Services Limited, and Messrs Michael Julian Kenney-Herbert, David William Roberts, David Henry Christopher Hill, William Thomas Davies and William Henry Kenneth Simpson

This public statement is more than 1 year old

Public statement 31 January 2012
  • Subscribe
  • RSS

Trustcorp Services Limited, and Messrs Michael Julian Kenney-Herbert (R), David William Roberts (R), David Henry Christopher Hill (R), William Thomas Davies (R) and William Henry Kenneth Simpson (R)


  • Trustcorp Services Limited, and Messrs Michael Julian Kenney-Herbert (R), David William Roberts (R), David Henry Christopher Hill (R), William Thomas Davies (R) and William Henry Kenneth Simpson (R)Trustcorp Services Limited, and Messrs Michael Julian Kenney-Herbert (R), David William Roberts (R), David Henry Christopher Hill (R), William Thomas Davies (R) and William Henry Kenneth Simpson (R)

Public Statement

Trustcorp Services Limited and affiliated members, namely:

Trustcorp Secretaries Limited; Trustcorp Nominees Limited; Trustcorp Limited; Catot Limited; T&B Limited; TCD 1 Limited; TCD2 Limited;

(together, "TSL")

Michael Julian Kenney-Herbert;

David William Roberts;

David Henry Christopher Hill

William Thomas Davies; and

William Henry Kenneth Simpson.

(together, the "Principals")

Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998, as amended (the "FS(J)L")

The Jersey Financial Services Commission (the "Commission") issues this public statement pursuant to Article 25 of the FS(J)L.

1. Introduction

1.1. TSL is presently authorised by the Commission to conduct Trust Company Business as defined in the FS(J)L. Following concerns over compliance by TSL, through the conduct of the Principals, with applicable laws and the Codes of Practice for Trust Company Business (the "Codes"), the Commission commenced an investigation into TSL and the Principals (the "Investigation"). The Investigation focussed, albeit not solely, on business introduced to TSL by intermediaries based in the Far East.

1.2. The Principals and TSL have co-operated with the Commission throughout the course of the Investigation.

2. Summary of Findings

2.1. Corporate governance exercised by the Principals, with particular reference to the trust company business services that were provided to those entities that were subject to the Commission’s Investigation, was seriously deficient: there was no effective span of control. The lack of effective corporate governance was a significant factor, resulting in a number of key failings, including, but not limited to, breaches of the FS(J)L and the Codes, as outlined below:

2.2. Key failings:

2.2.1. There was a failure to maintain appropriate accounting records for certain structures under administration.

2.2.2. Excessive reliance was placed on intermediaries providing instructions on behalf of TSL’s customers. On numerous occasions, TSL acted on such instructions without undertaking any assessment of the rationale or purpose behind the instruction.

2.2.3. Serious conflicts of interest arose and were not managed appropriately or at all. Such conflicts were not documented or acknowledged to exist.

2.2.4. Transactions were executed without reference to the constitutive documents governing certain customer structures.

2.2.5. There was a lack of transparency in respect of fees charged by TSL on behalf of itself and certain intermediaries.

2.2.6. TSL's Compliance and Anti-Money Laundering functions for the period 31 December 2005 – 25 November 2009 were ineffective.

2.2.7. On certain occasions, TSL failed to maintain proper systems and controls sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the requirement to keep adequate financial resources.

3. Breaches of the FS(J)L

3.1. Certain non-regulated entities in the TSL group were providing trust company business services to TSL’s customers without having the appropriate registration under the FS(J)L which constituted unauthorised financial service business pursuant to Article 7 of the FS(J)L.

4. Breaches of the Codes

4.1. The Codes were first issued by the Commission on 27 November 2000 and have been subject to revision. The Codes establish 7 core principles for the conduct of Trust Company Business. Those identified by the Commission as having been breached in this case were as follows:-

4.1.1. Principle 1: A registered person must conduct its business with integrity.

4.1.2. Principle 2: A registered person must have the highest regard for the interests of its customers.

4.1.3. Principle 3: A registered person must organise and control its affairs effectively for the proper performance of its business activities and be able to demonstrate the existence of adequate risk management systems.

4.1.4. Principle 4: A registered person must be transparent in its business arrangements.

4.1.5. Principle 5: A registered person must maintain, and be able to demonstrate, the existence of adequate financial resources and adequate insurance.

5. The Principals

5.1. The Investigation has concluded the Principals failed to act with fitness and propriety in the management and control of TSL. Each of the Principals have been issued with directions under Article 23(1) of the FS(J)L (and the equivalent provisions of the other regulatory laws1, which prevents them from performing any function, engaging in any employment or holding any position in the business of a registered person without first obtaining the prior consent of the Commission. The Principals are further prohibited from performing any function or service which falls within the definition of financial service business under Article 2 of the FS(J)L.

6. Cessation of Business

6.1. TSL is not fit and proper to be registered for the conduct of Trust Company Business under the FS(J)L and has submitted a cessation of business plan to the Commission which will result in the orderly wind-up of the business, after which TSL's authorisation to conduct Trust Company Business under the FS(J)L will be revoked.

7. Trustcorp (Jersey) Limited

7.1. The Investigation did not concern affiliated entities Trustcorp (Jersey) Limited, Roanne Trust Company (Jersey) Limited, Roanne Secretaries Limited, Roanne Securities Limited, Roanne (Nominees) Limited or Roanne Limited, all of which continue to be authorised by the Commission.

7.2. As at the date of this public statement, the Commission considers there to be no reason to require it to investigate Trustcorp (Jersey) Limited and its subsidiary companies, its business comprising a separate book of customers.

8. Conclusion

8.1. The Commission regards effective corporate governance as key for a regulated entity to be able to demonstrate compliance with applicable legislation and Codes of Practice.

Jersey Financial Services Commission

14-18 Castle Street

St. Helier

Jersey Financial Services Commission JE4 8TP

Contact: Barry Faudemer, Director, Enforcement Division

Telephone: 01534 822137, or Email: b.faudemer@jerseyfsc.org

1 The Banking Business (Jersey) Law 1991, as amended

The Collective Investment Funds (Jersey) Law 1988, as amended

The Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996, as amended

31 January 2012

Other news and events

  • Events and webinars
  • Industry updates
  • News
  • Public statements
  • Public statements archive
  • Restricted persons
  • Subscribe

Recent updates

Industry Update 31 March 2026

Catch up on our strategy and business plan launch

Industry Update 30 March 2026

Simplified regulation strengthens Jersey’s competitiveness

Industry Update 30 March 2026

New FAQs published to support firms with common authorisation queries

All news

Next events and webinars

NPO drop-in session – December 2026

08 December 2026

NPO drop-in session – September 2026

15 September 2026
All events and webinars

Was this page useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback.

To help us improve, tell us more about your visit today. Please fill in this short feedback survey.

  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Directors
  • Privacy policy
  • Subscribe
  • Whistleblowing
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Back to top
© 2026 Jersey Financial Services Commission

This website uses cookies to analyse our traffic. To find out more read our cookie policy.