Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About us
    • Board of Commissioners
    • Directors
    • Contact us
    • Data protection
    • Making a complaint
    • Our teams
      • Enforcement
      • Policy and Risk
      • Registry
      • Supervision
      • Intelligence
    • Strategic Roadmap
  • Careers
  • Industry
    • Codes of Practice
      • Alternative Investment Funds Code of Practice
      • Certified Funds Code of Practice
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 1
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 2
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 3
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 4
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 5
      • Fund Services Business Code of Practice
      • General Insurance Mediation Business Code of Practice
      • Insurance Business Code of Practice
      • Investment Business Code of Practice
      • Money Service Business Code of Practice
      • Trust Company Business Code of Practice
    • Consultations
      • Fee consultation No 3 2024 - Feedback Paper
      • 2024 consultations
      • 2023 consultations
      • 2022 consultations
      • 2021 consultations
      • 2020 consultations
      • 2019 consultations
      • 2018 consultations
      • 2017 consultations
      • 2016 consultations
    • Examinations
    • Fees
    • Financial crime
    • Innovation Hub
      • About
      • Help
      • Collaboration
      • Regtech
      • Fintech
      • Suptech
      • Virtual Asset Service Providers
      • Local partnerships and associations
      • Innovation reports
    • Forms
    • Guidance and policy
    • International-co-operation
      • International assessments
      • Memoranda of Understanding
      • Sanctions
    • Legislation
    • Regulated entities
    • Risk
      • National Risk Assessments
    • Sectors
      • Auditors
      • Banking
      • Funds
        • Fund statistics FAQs
      • General Insurance Mediation Business
      • Insurance
      • Investment Business
      • Financial Crime - Schedule 2 Business
      • Trust Company Business
      • Non- profit organisations
        • Non-profit organisations legislation
        • NPO risk assessment
        • Non-profit-organisations-risk-assessment
      • Financial Institutions
      • Money Service Business
    • Schedule 2 Business FAQs
    • Sustainable finance
  • News and events
    • Events and webinars
    • Industry updates
    • News
    • Public statements and warnings
    • RSS feeds
    • Subscribe
  • Protecting the public
    • Fraud prevention
    • Investment mis-selling
    • World Investor Week
    • Retail business accepting large sums of cash
  • Publications
    • Annual reports
    • Business plans
    • Presentations
    • Service reports
    • Engagement reports
  • Registry
    • Annual confirmation
    • Beneficial ownership information
    • Register or make a change
    • Registry fees
    • Registry forms
    • Registry legislation
    • Registry notices
      • Public notices
    • 2025 Registry fees
    • 2024 Registry fees
  • Whistleblowing
  • Login
Jersey Financial Services Commission Jersey Financial Services Commission
  • About us
  • Industry
  • Registry
  • Protecting the public
  • News and events
  • Login

Popular searches

  • Industry Survey
  • Annual confirmation statement
  • Business Plan
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Guidance notes
  • myProfile
  • myRegistry
  • Outsourcing
  • Sanctions
  • Sound business policy
  • Consumer credit

You are here

  • Home
  • News and events
  • Landmark judgment for the JFSC
News 29 May 2018

Landmark Royal Court judgment for the JFSC in Francis case

The Royal Court Judgment published last week (25 May, 2018) is a landmark case not only for the Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC) but for the finance industry in Jersey.

The Royal Court has upheld the JFSC’s findings that Mr David Francis acted with the most serious lack of integrity and competence. The Court concluded that the issue of a public statement by the JFSC setting out his misconduct was a reasonable step to take.

Chairman of the JFSC Lord Eatwell, commented:

“We are pleased that the Royal Court accepted that the actions of the Jersey Financial Services Commission were justified and agreed with its finding that Mr Francis lacked integrity and was incompetent. As the Judgment makes very clear, there is no place in our finance industry for those that lack integrity and fail to treat their clients fairly. Helpfully the Royal Court Judgement identifies areas where the JFSC could improve its processes. All the changes suggested by the Court will be adopted.”

The JFSC will seek to recover its costs in this case.

The full Royal Court Judgment can be found on the Jersey Legal Information Board here and the JFSC’s Public Statement can be accessed here.

 

Other news and events

  • Events and webinars
  • Industry updates
  • News
  • Public statements
  • Public statements archive
  • Restricted persons
  • Subscribe

Recent updates

Industry update 08 January 2026

Submit your 2026 annual confirmation

Industry update 08 January 2026

Basel III prudential roadmap update: feedback and next steps

Industry update 07 January 2026

Update: AML/CFT/CPF Handbook

All news

Next events and webinars

Drop-in session one - consultation on Article 36 guideline updates

12 January 2026

Drop-in session: follow-on consultation on complex structures

20 January 2026
All events and webinars
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Directors
  • Privacy policy
  • Subscribe
  • Whistleblowing
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Back to top
© 2026 Jersey Financial Services Commission

This website uses cookies to analyse our traffic. To find out more read our cookie policy.