Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About us
    • Board of Commissioners
    • Directors
    • Contact us
    • Data protection
    • Making a complaint
    • Our teams
      • Enforcement
      • Policy and Risk
      • Registry
      • Supervision
      • Intelligence
    • Strategic Roadmap
  • Careers
  • Industry
    • Codes of Practice
      • Alternative Investment Funds Code of Practice
      • Certified Funds Code of Practice
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 1
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 2
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 3
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 4
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 5
      • Fund Services Business Code of Practice
      • General Insurance Mediation Business Code of Practice
      • Insurance Business Code of Practice
      • Investment Business Code of Practice
      • Money Service Business Code of Practice
      • Trust Company Business Code of Practice
    • Consultations
      • Fee consultation No 3 2024 - Feedback Paper
      • 2024 consultations
      • 2023 consultations
      • 2022 consultations
      • 2021 consultations
      • 2020 consultations
      • 2019 consultations
      • 2018 consultations
      • 2017 consultations
      • 2016 consultations
    • Examinations
    • Fees
    • Financial crime
    • Innovation Hub
      • About
      • Help
      • Collaboration
      • Regtech
      • Fintech
      • Suptech
      • Virtual Asset Service Providers
      • Local partnerships and associations
      • Innovation reports
    • Forms
    • Guidance and policy
    • International-co-operation
      • International assessments
      • Memoranda of Understanding
      • Sanctions
    • Legislation
    • Regulated entities
    • Risk
      • National Risk Assessments
    • Sectors
      • Auditors
      • Banking
      • Funds
        • Fund statistics FAQs
      • General Insurance Mediation Business
      • Insurance
      • Investment Business
      • Financial Crime - Schedule 2 Business
      • Trust Company Business
      • Non- profit organisations
        • Non-profit organisations legislation
        • NPO risk assessment
        • Non-profit-organisations-risk-assessment
      • Financial Institutions
      • Money Service Business
    • Schedule 2 Business FAQs
    • Sustainable finance
  • News and events
    • Events and webinars
    • Industry updates
    • News
    • Public statements and warnings
    • RSS feeds
    • Subscribe
  • Protecting the public
    • Fraud prevention
    • Investment mis-selling
    • World Investor Week
    • Retail business accepting large sums of cash
  • Publications
    • Annual reports
    • Business plans
    • Presentations
    • Service reports
    • Engagement reports
  • Registry
    • Annual confirmation
    • Beneficial ownership information
    • Register or make a change
    • Registry fees
    • Registry forms
    • Registry legislation
    • Registry notices
      • Public notices
    • 2025 Registry fees
    • 2024 Registry fees
  • Whistleblowing
  • Login
Jersey Financial Services Commission Jersey Financial Services Commission
  • About us
  • Industry
  • Registry
  • Protecting the public
  • News and events
  • Login

Popular searches

  • Industry Survey
  • Annual confirmation statement
  • Business Plan
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Guidance notes
  • myProfile
  • myRegistry
  • Outsourcing
  • Sanctions
  • Sound business policy
  • Consumer credit

You are here

  • Home
  • News and events
  • JFSC fines Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets Plc, Jersey Branch (LBCM, Jersey Branch) for regulatory and AML/CFT breaches
News 12 August 2022

JFSC fines Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets Plc, Jersey Branch (LBCM, Jersey Branch) for regulatory and AML/CFT breaches

LBCM, Jersey Branch has been issued with a £498,000.00 civil financial penalty for breaching its regulatory requirements in relation to one correspondent banking[i] relationship.

For a protracted period LBCM, Jersey Branch failed to adequately identify the correspondent banking relationship and apply appropriate AML/CFT systems and controls. LBCM, Jersey Branch treated the relevant relationship as a normal commercial customer. A correspondent banking relationship may present financial crime risk factors. The JFSC accordingly places great importance on registered persons identifying correspondent banking relationships and ensuring that any higher risk factors are appropriately assessed and mitigated, with effective systems and controls in place.

Jill Britton, Director General commented:

“This penalty is levied following LBCM, Jersey Branch’s breaches of the regulatory and AML/CFT regime in regard to its one correspondent banking relationship.

LBCM, Jersey Branch failed to identify the correspondent banking relationship over a protracted period. It consequently failed to put in place appropriate systems and controls for the activity and did not appropriately assess and mitigate any higher risk factors arising. LBCM, Jersey Branch was, therefore, left exposed to an increased risk of financial crime occurring.

Whilst the nature of this correspondent banking activity did not present the highest risks typically associated with correspondent banking relationships, AML/CFT failures can undermine the integrity and stability of Jersey’s financial services industry. Registered persons must ensure they have effective systems and controls across their business activities to prevent and detect financial crime.

The JFSC took account of LBCM, Jersey Branch’s strong compliance record prior to this matter, its remediation of the issues and its full co-operation in this process. LBCM, Jersey Branch no longer provides any correspondent banking services.”

Alasdair Gardner, LBCM, Jersey Branch CEO commented:

“We accept the JFSC’s findings, recognising that not fully adhering to the regulations relating to managing the correspondent banking relationship was not acceptable.

The breaches related to one customer relationship with another Jersey financial institution. While the breaches exposed ourselves to increased risks of financial crime, we conducted our own internal review and did not identify any financial crime as having occurred or any customer losses from the matters identified.

We are pleased that the JFSC has also acknowledged our strong compliance record prior to this matter. The JFSC also recognised our full co-operation with their process.”

The JFSC has issued a public statement outlining the findings of its case.

[i] Correspondent banking is the provision of banking services by one bank (the correspondent bank) to another bank (the respondent bank). If not governed appropriately, correspondent banking presents a number of financial crime risks which may be exploited. The correspondent bank typically has no direct relationship with the underlying parties to a transaction and is therefore not in a position to verify their identities or conduct due diligence.

Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets Plc, Jersey Branch (LBCM, Jersey Branch) Public Statement

 

 

 

Other news and events

  • Events and webinars
  • Industry updates
  • News
  • Public statements
  • Public statements archive
  • Restricted persons
  • Subscribe

Recent updates

Industry update 16 February 2026

Countries and territories in AML/CFT/CPF Handbook appendices updated – 13 February 2026

Industry update 13 February 2026

Stay safe from romance fraud

Industry update 09 February 2026

Submit your 2026 regulatory fee information by Sunday 15 February

All news

Next events and webinars

Senior Officer 1:1 Drop-In - March 2026

02 March 2026
All events and webinars

Related links

  • Lloyds Bank Corporate Markets Plc, Jersey Branch (LBCM, Jersey Branch)
  • Accessibility
  • Contact us
  • Directors
  • Privacy policy
  • Subscribe
  • Whistleblowing
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Back to top
© 2026 Jersey Financial Services Commission

This website uses cookies to analyse our traffic. To find out more read our cookie policy.