Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About us
    • Board of Commissioners
    • Directors
    • Contact us
    • Data protection
    • Making a complaint
    • Our teams
      • Enforcement
      • Policy and Risk
      • Registry
      • Supervision
      • Intelligence
    • JFSC Connect
  • Careers
  • Industry
    • Codes of Practice
      • Alternative Investment Funds Code of Practice
      • Certified Funds Code of Practice
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 1
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 2
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 3
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 4
        • Certified Funds Code of Practice Schedule 5
      • Fund Services Business Code of Practice
      • General Insurance Mediation Business Code of Practice
      • Insurance Business Code of Practice
      • Investment Business Code of Practice
      • Money Service Business Code of Practice
      • Trust Company Business Code of Practice
      • Alternative Investment Funds Code of Practice (1)
    • Consultations
      • Fee consultation No 3 2024 - Feedback Paper
      • 2024 consultations
      • 2023 consultations
      • 2022 consultations
      • 2021 consultations
      • 2020 consultations
      • 2019 consultations
      • 2018 consultations
      • 2017 consultations
      • 2016 consultations
      • 2025 consultations
    • Examinations
    • Fees
    • Financial crime
    • Innovation Hub
      • About
      • Help
      • Collaboration
      • Regtech
      • Fintech
      • Suptech
      • Virtual Asset Service Providers
      • Local partnerships and associations
      • Innovation reports
    • Forms
    • Guidance and policy
    • International-co-operation
      • International assessments
      • Memoranda of Understanding
      • Sanctions
    • Legislation
    • Regulated entities
    • Risk
      • National Risk Assessments
    • Sectors
      • Auditors
      • Banking
      • Funds
      • General Insurance Mediation Business
      • Insurance
      • Investment Business
      • Financial Crime - Schedule 2 Business
      • Trust Company Business
      • Non- profit organisations
        • Non-profit organisations legislation
        • NPO risk assessment
      • Financial Institutions
      • Money Service Business
    • Schedule 2 Business FAQs
    • Sustainable finance
  • News and events
    • Events and webinars
    • Industry updates
    • News
    • Public statements and warnings
    • RSS feeds
    • Subscribe
  • Protecting the public
    • Fraud prevention
    • Investment mis-selling
    • Complaints reporting and whistleblowing
  • Publications
    • Annual reports
    • Business plans
    • Presentations
    • Service reports
    • Engagement reports
    • 2026-2030 strategy
  • Registry
    • Annual confirmation
    • Beneficial ownership information
    • Register or make a change
    • Registry fees
    • Registry forms
    • Registry legislation
    • Registry notices
      • Public notices
    • 2025 Registry fees
    • 2024 Registry fees
  • Whistleblowing
  • Login
Jersey Financial Services Commission Jersey Financial Services Commission
  • About us
  • Industry
  • Registry
  • Protecting the public
  • News and events
  • Login

Popular searches

  • Industry Survey
  • Annual confirmation statement
  • Business Plan
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Guidance notes
  • myProfile
  • myRegistry
  • Outsourcing
  • Sanctions
  • Sound business policy
  • Consumer credit

You are here

  • Home
  • News and events
  • Landmark judgment for the JFSC

This article is more than 1 year old

News 29 May 2018

Landmark Royal Court judgment for the JFSC in Francis case

The Royal Court Judgment published last week (25 May, 2018) is a landmark case not only for the Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC) but for the finance industry in Jersey.

The Royal Court has upheld the JFSC’s findings that Mr David Francis acted with the most serious lack of integrity and competence. The Court concluded that the issue of a public statement by the JFSC setting out his misconduct was a reasonable step to take.

Chairman of the JFSC Lord Eatwell, commented:

“We are pleased that the Royal Court accepted that the actions of the Jersey Financial Services Commission were justified and agreed with its finding that Mr Francis lacked integrity and was incompetent. As the Judgment makes very clear, there is no place in our finance industry for those that lack integrity and fail to treat their clients fairly. Helpfully the Royal Court Judgement identifies areas where the JFSC could improve its processes. All the changes suggested by the Court will be adopted.”

The JFSC will seek to recover its costs in this case.

The full Royal Court Judgment can be found on the Jersey Legal Information Board here and the JFSC’s Public Statement can be accessed here.

 

Other news and events

  • Events and webinars
  • Industry updates
  • News
  • Public statements
  • Public statements archive
  • Restricted persons
  • Subscribe

Recent updates

Industry update 04 September 2026

Industry feedback supports updates to our bank licensing policy

Industry update 04 September 2026

Update to how we describe civil financial penalties

Public statement 28 August 2026

Freidman Capital Group LLC and Stonebridge Entity Group (the scam entities)

All news

Next events and webinars

NPO drop-in session – September 2026

15 September 2026

NPO drop-in session – December 2026

08 December 2026
All events and webinars

Was this page useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback.

To help us improve, tell us more about your visit today. Please fill in this short feedback survey.

Stay informed
  • Subscribe to our emails
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to RSS
Get in touch
  • Contact us
  • Complaints and whistleblowing
  • Press enquiries
About
  • About us
  • Directors
  • Privacy policy
  • Publications
© 2026 Jersey Financial Services Commission
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn